Gonzales Research &

Marketing Strategies

www.garesearch.com

 

 

 

Maryland Poll - Part 2

 

U.S. Senate Match-up

Democratic Presidential Primary Contest

 

October 2003

 

 

 

Contact: Patrick Gonzales    410-974-4669

 

 

 


 

Methodology

 

 

 

 

 

Patrick E. Gonzales graduated from the University of Baltimore in 1981 with a degree in political science.  He is the former president of Mason-Dixon Campaign Polling and Gonzales/Arscott Research & Communications, Inc. 

 

Over the past two decades, Mr. Gonzales has polled and analyzed hundreds of elections in Maryland.  Additionally, he and his associates have conducted numerous market research projects and crafted message development programs for businesses and organizations throughout the state.

 

This survey was conducted by Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies from October 20th through October 26th, 2003.  A total of 831 registered voters in Maryland who vote regularly were interviewed by telephone.  A cross-section of interviews were conducted in each jurisdiction within the state to reflect general election voting patterns.

 

The margin for error, according to customary statistical standards, is no more than plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.  There is a 95 percent probability that the “true” figures would fall within this range if the entire survey universe were sampled.  The margin for error is higher for any demographic subgroup, such as gender or party affiliation.

 

This survey also includes a sample of 317 likely March 2004 Democratic primary voters.  The margin for error on this sample is plus or minus 6 percentage points. 

 

 

 


Maryland Statewide Poll Sample Demographics

 

Gender

Race

Region

 

Male         414   (50%)

 

White        629   (76%)

 

Eastern Shore/S Md   104    (13%)

Female      417   (50%)

Black        187   (23%)

Baltimore City             81    (10%)

 

Other/Ref   15 

Baltimore Suburbs     287    (35%)

 

 

Washington Suburbs  265    (32%)

 

 

Western Maryland       94    (11%)

 

 

 

Party Registration

 

 

 

Democrat         472   (57%)

 

 

 

Republican       258   (31%)

 

 

Independent     101   (12%)

 

 

 

Regional Groupings are as follows:

 

Eastern Shore/ Southern Md

 

Baltimore City

Baltimore Suburbs

Washington Suburbs

Western Maryland

 

Calvert Co.

 

Baltimore City

 

Anne Arundel Co.

 

Montgomery Co.

 

Allegany Co.

Caroline Co.

 

Baltimore Co.

 Prince George’s Co.

Carroll Co.

Cecil Co.

 

Harford Co.

 

Frederick Co.

Charles Co.

 

Howard Co.

 

Garrett Co.

Dorchester Co.

 

 

 

Washington Co.

Kent Co.

 

 

 

 

Queen Anne’s Co.

 

 

 

 

Somerset Co.

 

 

 

 

St. Mary’s Co.

 

 

 

 

Talbot Co.

 

 

 

 

Wicomico Co.

 

 

 

 

Worcester Co.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Democratic Primary Sample Demographics

 

Gender

Race

 

Male         136   (43%)

 

White        212   (67%)

Female      181   (57%)

Black          99   (31%)

 

Other/Ref     6 

Summary

 

 

United States Senate Contest

 

Barbara Mikulski, who’s represented Maryland voters for the past 27 years in Congress, the first ten (1976-1986) as a member of the House of Representatives from Baltimore and the last 17 in the U.S. Senate, remains popular with her constituents.  

 

Statewide, 56% have a favorable opinion of Mikulski, 22% have an unfavorable opinion of her, 19% say their view toward her is neutral, and 3% don’t recognize her name.

 

 

 

 

 

Mikulski’s likely GOP opponent, Eastern Shore State Senator Edward J. (E.J.) Pipkin, is recognized favorably by 13% of voters, unfavorably by 3%, with 20% having a neutral opinion of the former investment banker, and 64% do not recognize his name.

 

Pipkin, who announced his candidacy earlier this month, currently represents just 1/47th of the state in the Maryland senate.  The 36% name recognition among state voters Pipkin has a full year before the general election is not a bad position from which to begin his charge.  But as with any campaign involving an entrenched incumbent, challenger Pipkin will ultimately need to convince voters that it’s time for a change if he’s to be successful in November 2004.

 

In an election match-up, Mikulski leads Pipkin 57% to 26%, with 17% undecided.  Among Democrats, Mikulski’s up 78%-9%; among Republicans, Pipkin enjoys a reflexive 63%-21% advantage.  And among independents, who cast the swing votes in competitive elections, Mikulski has a decisive 54% to 8% advantage.  In order to win, Pipkin will need to drive down Mikulski’s party-base vote under 70 percent and flip independents.  Not an easy task against an incumbent who’s well known and well liked. 

 

Mikulski leads Pipkin in every region of the state, but on his Eastern Shore base the margin is a razor thin 43%-41%.

 

 

 

 

 

We next asked voters the following:  Barbara Mikulski has represented Maryland voters in Congress for the past 27 years.  Some say Mikulski represents the status quo, that she hasn’t done enough to create jobs and improve schools, and that it’s time for a change.  Others say Marylanders know Mikulski, that she’s been an effective senator who’s fought for jobs and families, and she deserves re-election.  Do you think Mikulski’s been around too long and it’s time for a change, or do you think Mikulski’s been an effective senator who deserves re-election?”  This is the type of question campaigns often times will employ to test their prospective positions.

 

Statewide, 53% express the opinion that Mikulski’s been effective and deserves re-election, 31% declare that she’s been around too long and it’s time for a change, and 16%

aren’t sure.  Even with this framing of the contest, we found that Mikulski’s support among Democrats remains a solid 74%; she continues to capture nearly 1-in-5 Republicans; and her lead among independents is over 30 points…a glimpse of the tough assignment that lies ahead for Pipkin.

 

 

Democratic Presidential Politics

 

Former Vermont Governor Howard Dean continues to lead the field in Maryland among likely March 2004 Democratic primary voters.

 

Statewide, 23% support Dean, 20% favor former V.P. nominee Joe Lieberman, 11% back recently entered Wesley Clark, 9% say they’re for Congressman Richard Gephardt, 7% support John Edwards and John Kerry, 6% are for Reverend Al Sharpton, 2% back former Illinois Senator Carol Moseley Braun, and 1% pick vocal anti-war Congressman Dennis Kucinich. 

 

Democratic Primary in Maryland

 

 

Voter Discontent

 

In order to gauge whether voter antagonism toward the political establishment as evidenced in the recent California recall has spilled over into the Free State, we asked the following question:  “Some observers have concluded that voter anger and discontent with Governor Gray Davis was a major factor in the recent recall vote in California.  How likely is it that your vote in next year's presidential election will be determined by anger at President Bush: very likely, somewhat likely, somewhat unlikely, or very unlikely?”   Statewide, 30% say it’s “very likely,” 22% say it’s somewhat likely, 10% say “somewhat unlikely,” and 33% say “very unlikely.” 

 

We discovered that among Democrats, 80% (49% “very likely”/31% “somewhat likely”) say that their vote next year will at least to some extent be determined by anger toward Bush, and among black voters, 87% declaim likewise.

 

But given that Maryland tilts heavily Democratic in federal elections - Bush lost here by 17 points three years ago (57%-40%) – and given that Gray Davis’s disapproval rating was 75% when he was booted from office earlier this month, the overall results here (52% likely to cast a vote in anger/only 30% “very” likely) don’t seem to suggest that Maryland voters have yet arrived near the limit that their Golden State counterparts were pushed.  The polling numbers hint, however, that the potential may be in place for this anger to breed and grow depending on what happens between now and next year. 

 

 

 


Name Recognition

 

I am going to read you the names of several individuals.  After I mention each name, I would like you to tell me if you recognize that person.  If you do, I would then like you to tell me whether you have a favorable, unfavorable, or neutral opinion of that individual.

 

 

 

 

Favorable

 

 

Unfavorable

 

 

Neutral

 

Don’t Recognize

 

 

 

 

 

 

Barbara Mikulski

 

56%

 

22%

 

19%

 

3%

 

Edward J. (E.J.) Pipkin

 

13%

 

3%

 

20%

 

64%

 

 

 

QUESTION: If the November 2004 election for U.S. Senate were held today, for whom would you vote if the candidates were Edward J. (E.J.) Pipkin, the Republican, and Barbara Mikulski, the Democrat?

 

Statewide Results

 

Response

Statewide

 

 

Mikulski

57%

Pipkin

26%

Undecided

17%

 

 

 

Party   2004 United States Senate Match-up?

 

 

Party

Mikulski

Pipkin

Undecided

 

 

 

 

Democrat

78%

9%

13%

Republican

21%

63%

16%

Independent

54%

8%

38%

 

 

Gender   2004 United States Senate Match-up?

 

 

Gender

Mikulski

Pipkin

Undecided

 

 

 

 

Men

46%