Research &
Communications, Inc
Maryland Poll
February 2000
Presidential
Contest
Contact: Carol Arscott 410-461-5744
Methodology
Patrick E. Gonzales and Carol
A. Arscott, the former president and vice president of Mason-Dixon Campaign
Polling & Strategy, Inc., formed Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies, Inc. at the beginning of 1999.
Gonzales is a 1981 graduate of
the University of Baltimore with deep roots in the Anne Arundel County
Democratic Party who served as a principal advisor to Janet Owens’ 1998
campaign for County Executive. Arscott
is a 1977 graduate of the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service and a
former chairman of the Howard County Republican Party.
Gonzales and Arscott
together have over 30 years of professional experience in politics. They have served as pollsters and
consultants to dozens of political clients in Maryland since the mid-1980s,
including County Executives Janet Owens, Doug Duncan, Jim Harkins, Chuck Ecker,
Eileen Rehrmann, and Robert Neall; and State Senators Tom Bromwell, Marty
Madden, John Astle, Chris McCabe, and Jean Roesser.
This survey was conducted by
Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies, Inc. from February 23rd through
February 27th, 2000. A total
of 807 registered voters in Maryland were interviewed by telephone. All stated they vote regularly in statewide
general elections. A cross-section of
calls was made into each jurisdiction within the state to reflect general
election voting patterns.
The margin for error,
according to customary statistical standards, is no more than plus or minus 3.5
percentage points. This means that
there is a 95 percent probability that the “true” figures would fall within
this range if the entire survey universe were sampled. The margin for error is higher for any
demographic subgroup, such as gender, or race.
This survey also includes an over sampling of 393 likely March 7th Democratic presidential primary voters and 346 likely March 7th Republican presidential primary voters. The margin for error is ± 5% for the Democratic primary sub-sample and ± 5.5% for the Republican primary sub-sample. The respondents comprising these over samplings were only asked the questions pertaining to their party primary.
Ó This survey is provided free of charge. However, we ask that Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies, Inc. of Annapolis be credited if the survey is cited in a news story or column.
Maryland Statewide Poll Sample Demographics
|
Gender Male 401 (50%) Female 406 (50%) |
|
Party Democrat 465 (58%) Republican 264 (33%) Independent 78 (10%) |
|
Race White 613 (76%) Black 186 (23%) Other 8 |
|
Region
|
Regional
Groupings
Eastern Shore/Southern Maryland - includes voters in these counties: Calvert, Caroline, Cecil, Charles, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, St. Mary’s, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester.
Baltimore City - includes voters in the City of Baltimore.
Baltimore Suburbs - includes voters in these counties: Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Harford, and Howard.
Washington Suburbs - includes voters in these counties: Montgomery, and Prince George’s.
Western Maryland - includes voters in these counties: Allegany, Carroll, Frederick, Garrett, and Washington.
Vice
President Al Gore has opened up a huge lead over former New Jersey Senator Bill
Bradley in the upcoming Maryland primary election, with Gore trouncing Bradley
63% to 24%, and the remaining 13% undecided.
Gore
tops Bradley in every demographic subgroup in our survey, erasing the early
lead Bradley held among men and whites in our January Maryland poll and, at the
same time, boosting his numbers with women and African-Americans. Gore gets 58% of men to Bradley’s 46% (37%
to 46% in our January survey), and earns a 68% share of the women’s vote
compared to 21% (52% to 30% in January) for the former basketball star.
Michael
Jordan’s endorsement notwithstanding, the insurmountable lead that Gore held
over Bradley among black voters in Maryland has widened even further, with a
whopping 81% of African-Americans in the Vice President’s camp, and just 11%
expressing a preference for Bradley (70% to 21% in January). Among white voters, Bradley’s early
advantage has evaporated. Where he once
led Gore 45% to 33%, he now trails the Vice President 54% to 31%.
Bradley’s
difficulties have nothing to do with the particulars of his campaign in
Maryland per se, but everything to do with the whole premise his campaign
nationwide. Bradley never made a
credible or coherent argument for denying the party’s nomination to its sitting
Vice President. This – along with the
fact that any notion that his campaign was “insurgent” has been eclipsed by
John McCain – will make it extremely
difficult for Bradley to get out of the doldrums. Voters are unwilling to process more than one insurgent campaign
at a time
Arizona
Senator John McCain has closed the 29-point gap that separated him from George
W. Bush in our January survey, but still trails the Texas Governor by 10 in our
latest poll, 47% to 37%. Only former
diplomat Alan Keyes remains standing among the also-rans, with 4% of the
vote. Twelve percent are undecided a
week before primary election day.
McCain
has improved his standing among both men and women in the Republican primary electorate,
up 10 points among men since January (from 29% to 39%) and more than doubling
his share of the vote among women (from 16% to 35%). Women were three times as likely to have been undecided in our
January survey (20% women, 7% men), but the percentage of undecided voters in
the Republican primary is equal with men and women now, at 12%.
Judging
by what we have seen in other states with open primaries, we are not surprised
by the divergent attitudes between registered Republicans and independents in
Maryland’s GOP primary. Bush handily
wins the Republican vote 54% to 30%, while McCain swamps Bush among
independents, 77% to 8%.
However,
the independent vote in Maryland is quite a different matter from the
independent vote in New Hampshire or South Carolina or Michigan. This party-building initiative, enacted last
spring at the Republican Party’s state convention, is a first time trial.
There
is no tradition of independents voting in party primaries in Maryland. It is not a part of the political culture
like it is in traditional open primary states.
Maryland independents technically “decline to affiliate” with a party,
and have done so knowing that they are opting out of participating in the
primary process. This is quite a
different situation from a state where registering as an independent allows a
voter to choose which ballot to take on election day, or from one where there
is no registration by party at all.
Maryland
is none of these things, and efforts to get the word out to independents here
that they are eligible to vote in the Republican primary has been slow. Less than half (48%) of independents we
surveyed said they were aware of their new privilege. All of this works against the likelihood that John McCain will
benefit from the independent vote in Maryland to the extent that he has in
other states.
Not
surprisingly, independents (96%) overwhelming approve of the Maryland
Republican Party’s decision to open up its primary to them this year. Republicans, however, were more
circumspect: Forty-nine percent of
registered Republicans approved of their party leadership’s decision to open
the primary to independents, while 46% disapproved.
While
Democratic Party leaders dismissed the Republicans’ expansion effort as an “act
of desperation” when it was announced last spring, Democratic primary voters
are enthusiastic about the idea.
Sixty-nine percent thought that the Democratic primary should be opened
to independents, while 23% did not.
Al
Gore has opened up a double-digit lead over George W. Bush in a general
election contest, besting Bush 54% to 37%, with 9% undecided. This is a considerable change from our
January survey, where Gore and Bush were in a statistical dead heat, with Gore
at 44% to Bush’s 42%. Gore
significantly improved his position with male voters in the six weeks since our
last survey, from 36% to 49%, while Bush slipped from 53% of men to 44% in
February. Gore is also holding more of
the Democratic vote in the general election, up to 77% from 64% in
January. Moreover, Gore gained eight
points (from 31% to 39%) of the independent vote while Bush lost nine points
(50% to 41%) among independent voters.
Our
January survey showed Gore and McCain in a statistical tie (41% to 40%), and
our February survey is much the same, with Gore leading McCain by just two
points, 47% to 45%. Gore leads with
women (53%) and Democrats (68%), while McCain takes the majority of men (52%),
Republicans (77%), and independents (56%).
While
Bill Bradley continues to hold a lead over George W. Bush in heavily-Democratic
Maryland (45% to 40%), McCain now holds a 12-point lead over the former Rhodes
scholar, beating him 47% to 35%. In our
January survey, Bradley led McCain by 10, 45% to 35%. Most significant in this contest are the independents, who were
with Bradley 37% to 32% with 31% undecided in January, but cast their lot with
McCain in February, 59% to 26%, with just 15% undecided.
A
quick look at the name identification numbers on these candidates begins to
explain these results. McCain has the
highest favorable rating at 53%, as well as the lowest unfavorable rating, at
23%. Gore is rated favorably by 48% of
respondents, and unfavorably by 34%.
Bush’s favorables outnumber his unfavorables by just nine points (42% to
33%), but he is in better shape with Maryland general election voters than
Bradley, whose favorable rating is 31%, with unfavorables uncomfortably close
at 29%.
Saving
Social Security/Medicare was, far and away, the most important issue to
Maryland general election voters in the presidential election, cited by 33% of
those surveyed in response to an open-ended question. Moreover, saving Social Security was named the Number One issue
for the supporters of each of the four major presidential candidates,
regardless of party. Certainly, Gore
voters (49%) and Bradley voters (43%) led the way, but McCain voters (25%)
place saving Social Security over character (22%), and Bush voters favor saving
Social Security (23%) over cutting taxes (19%).
Education
was the Number Two issue at 14%, and the Number Two issue with Gore (16%) and
Bradley (18%) voters. Education didn’t
place in the top three national concerns of Bush and McCain voters.
The
character of the candidate ranked third overall at 10%, spiking to 22% with
McCain voters, and placing third with Bush voters (18%). Character doesn’t seem to count as much with
voters for the two Democratic candidates.
Paying
down the national debt tied for fourth place with cutting taxes, at 8%. Each of these concerns placed high with
voters for the Republicans candidates, with cutting taxes the second most
important issue for Bush voters (19%) and paying down the debt the third most
important issue for McCain voters (13%).
Maintaining
the current economic condition was a priority for just 6% of voters overall,
but the issue placed third with both Gore (10%) and Bradley (9%) voters.
The
conventional wisdom that John McCain is the stronger Republican candidate
against Al Gore in November certainly holds true in Maryland, with the Arizona
senator holding an even larger share of the Republican vote against Gore than
does Bush. McCain makes it a real
contest here, while Bush loses badly to the Democratic front-runner.
A
Democratic candidate, however, will always start with a natural advantage in
Maryland, with Democrats outnumbering Republicans by nearly two-to-one. That is certainly born out in the issues
that the voters cite as most important, with the top two issues garnering
nearly a majority of voters, and those issues favoring the Democratic
candidate.
The
Free State is not a bellwether of the national vote in presidential elections, but
if the Republicans nominate someone who can compete here come November, watch
out!
Can McCain win the Maryland primary? Can he win the nomination? Both are tough uphill battles, but it’s clear that the voters are relishing the competition.
**** 393 Likely March 7th Democratic
Primary Voters ****
QUESTION: If
the March 7th Democratic presidential primary election were held
today, for whom would you vote: Bill
Bradley or
Al Gore?
|
|
Gore |
Bradley |
Undecided |
|
Statewide |
63% |
24% |
13% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Men |
58% |
27% |
15% |
|
Women |
68% |
21% |
11% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
White |
54% |
31% |
15% |
|
Black |
81% |
11% |
8% |
QUESTION: As
you may know, the Republican primary in Maryland is open to registered independents
for the first time this
year. Do you
think that the Maryland Democratic Party should open its primary elections to
allow independents to
vote in them, or not?
Yes, Allow 69%
No, don’t Allow 23%
No Answer
8%
**** 346 Likely March 7th GOP
Primary Voters ****
294 Registered Republicans
52 Registered Independents
QUESTION: If
the March 7th Republican presidential primary election were held
today, for whom would you vote: George
W. Bush, Alan Keyes, or John McCain?
QUESTION: As you may know, the Republican
primary in Maryland is open to registered independents for the first time this
year. Do you approve or disapprove of the
party’s decision to open the Republican primary to independents?
All Registered GOP Registered IND
Approve 56% 49% 96%
Disapprove
39%
46%
-
No
Answer
5%
5% 4%
QUESTION: Before you received this phone call, were you aware that registered independents were eligible to vote in the Republican primary this year, or not?
All Registered GOP Registered IND
Yes, Aware 42% 41% 48%
No, Not
aware 58% 59% 52%
General
Election Match-ups
QUESTION: If
the presidential general election were held today, for whom would you vote if
the candidates were Al Gore, the Democrat, and George W. Bush, the Republican?
|
|
Gore |
Bush |
Undecided |
|
Statewide |
54% |
37% |
9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Men |
49% |
44% |
7% |
|
Women |
59% |
30% |
11% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
77% |
17% |
6% |
|
Republican |
17% |
72% |
11% |
|
Independent |
39% |
41% |
20% |
QUESTION: If
the presidential general election were held today, for whom would you vote if the
candidates were Al Gore, the Democrat, and John McCain, the Republican?
|
|
Gore |
McCain |
Undecided |
|
Statewide |
47% |
45% |
8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Men |
41% |
52% |
7% |
|
Women |
53% |
38% |
9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
68% |
25% |
7% |
|
Republican |