Gonzales RM&S
Research &
Communications, Inc.
January 2003
Contact: Carol Arscott 410-461-5744
Methodology
Patrick E. Gonzales and
Carol A. Arscott formed Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies, Inc. at
the beginning of 1999.
Gonzales is a 1981 graduate
of the
This survey was conducted by
Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies, Inc. from January 16th
through
The margin for error,
according to customary statistical standards, is no more than plus or minus 3.5
percentage points. This means that there
is a 95 percent probability that the “true” figures would fall within this
range if the entire survey universe were sampled. The margin for error is higher for any
demographic subgroup, such as gender or race.
|
Gender |
Race |
Region |
|
Male 394
(49%) |
White 627
(78%) |
Eastern Shore 79
(10%) |
|
Female 413
(51%) |
Black 169
(21%) |
|
|
|
Other/Ref
11 |
|
|
Party Registration |
|
|
|
Democrat 453
(56%) |
|
|
|
Republican 264 (33%) |
|
|
|
Independent 90
(11%) |
|
|
Regional Groupings
Analysis
Forty-six
percent of
There
is both good news and bad news for the Ehrlich Administration on the issue of
slots. First, the good news: A narrow plurality of
The
bad news for Ehrlich is that the number of those who say they oppose slots
inched up three points from 37% to 40% over the last six months, and there have
been some dramatic shifts in support in some of the survey's demographic
subgroups, even as the top line numbers held pretty steady.
Democrats,
for example, favored slots at racetracks 47% to 36% in August, but oppose them
now, 49% to 41%. Ehrlich has been more
persuasive with his fellow Republicans, who now favor slots 49% to 32% (43% to
40% in August). Independents were among
the biggest boosters of slots in August (50% to 33%); they are even more sold
on the idea now, with 63% favoring slots at racetracks.
Among
the state's regions, the most dramatic shift occurred among
And
a slots gender gap is starting to open up:
Support among men increased from 45% to 56% in the six months since our
last survey on this subject, while sentiment among women flipped completely,
from 47% to 39% in favor back in August to 47% to 37% opposed today.
Slots for Education
A
second question repeated from our August survey asked if voters would
"favor or oppose allowing slot machines at
Compared
to any other remedy for bridging
The
chart below shows a comparison of this survey's results with those from our
July 2002 poll. In July 2002, a combined
60% of voters opted to close the budget deficit via slots and spending
cuts. In January 2003, that number is
58%.
|
|
Legalize Slots |
Cut Spending |
Increase Income Tax |
Increase Sales Tax Rate |
Expand Sales Tax |
No Answer |
|
Jan 2003 |
35% |
23% |
24% |
5% |
4% |
9% |
|
July 2002 |
29% |
31% |
16% |
9% |
6% |
9% |
Governor
Ehrlich's thematic inaugural address wasn't heavy on policy, but he did make a
point of mentioning his plans for a
Lieutenant
Governor Michael Steele's enjoys high ratings and a high profile. Forty-three percent view
Steele favorably, just 8% see him unfavorably, and 35% are neutral on
Steele. Only 14% failed to recognize his
name, pretty darned good for a brand new lieutenant governor, but not all that
unusual for Maryland LGs!
Ouch! Outgoing Governor Parris Glendening is viewed
unfavorably by a whopping 63% of the state's voters and favorably by just
22%. Fifteen percent are neutral on
Glendening, and his name ID is universal.
Not necessarily a good thing….
Talk
about steady! President George W. Bush's
numbers are identical to those he enjoyed when we last questioned voters about
him in September 2002. Fifty-four
percent have a favorable opinion of Bush, 29% hold an unfavorable opinion, and
17% are neutral.
Foreign
policy issues dominate when voters are asked to name the most important issue
facing the President and Congress.
Invading
Lesser
concerns are health care/prescription drugs (6%), taxes (3%), the budget
deficit (2%), the environment (2%), and crime/drugs (1%). The remaining 2% offered no answer.
QUESTION: Do you favor or oppose allowing slot machines at
|
|
Favor |
Oppose |
No Answer |
Statewide
|
46% |
40% |
14% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37% |
34% |
29% |
|
|
48% |
43% |
9% |
|
|
58% |
35% |
7% |
|
|
37% |
45% |
18% |
|
|
43% |
41% |
16% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56% |
33% |
11% |
|
|
37% |
47% |
16% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46% |
37% |
17% |
|
|
African-American |
45% |
50% |
5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
41% |
49% |
10% |
|
Republican |
49% |
32% |
19% |
|
Independent |
63% |
19% |
18% |
QUESTION: Would you favor or oppose allowing slot machines at
|
|
Favor |
Oppose |
No Answer |
Statewide
|
56% |
36% |
8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19% |
77% |
4% |
QUESTION: As you may know,
Legalize
slot machines at racetracks 35%
Increase
the income tax rate for households earning more than $100,000 24%
Cut
spending in state programs 23%
Increase
the sales tax rate, currently at five percent 5%
Expand
the sales tax to include services, like car repairs and dry cleaning 4%
No
answer 9%
QUESTION: In his inaugural address, Governor Ehrlich mentioned his plans for
a
Favor 45%
Oppose 30%
No answer 25%
Name Recognition
I am going to read you the names of several individuals. After I mention each name, I would like you to tell me if you recognize that person. If you do, I would then like you to tell me whether you have a favorable, unfavorable, or neutral opinion of that individual.
|
|
Favorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Don’t Recognize |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62% |
13% |
24% |
1% |
|