Research &
Communications, Inc
Maryland Poll
August 2000
2002
Gubernatorial Election
Part II
Contact: Carol Arscott
410-461-5744
Methodology
Patrick E. Gonzales and
Carol A. Arscott, the former president and vice president of Mason-Dixon
Campaign Polling & Strategy, Inc., formed Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies, Inc. at the beginning of 1999.
Gonzales is a 1981 graduate
of the University of Baltimore with deep roots in the Anne Arundel County
Democratic Party who served as a principal advisor to Janet Owens’ 1998
campaign for County Executive. Arscott
is a 1977 graduate of the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service and a
former chairman of the Howard County Republican Party.
Gonzales and Arscott
together have over 30 years of professional experience in politics. They have served as pollsters and
consultants to dozens of political clients in Maryland since the mid-1980s,
including County Executives Janet Owens, Doug Duncan, Jim Harkins, Chuck Ecker,
Eileen Rehrmann, and Robert Neall; and State Senators Tom Bromwell, Marty
Madden, John Astle, Chris McCabe, and Jean Roesser.
This survey was conducted by
Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies, Inc. from August 23rd
through August 28th, 2000. A
total of 649 registered voters in Maryland were interviewed by telephone. All stated they vote regularly in statewide
general elections. A cross-section of
calls was made into each jurisdiction within the state to reflect general
election voting patterns.
The margin for error,
according to customary statistical standards, is no more than plus or minus 4
percentage points. This means that
there is a 95 percent probability that the “true” figures would fall within this
range if the entire survey universe were sampled. The margin for error is higher for any demographic subgroup, such
as gender, or race.
This survey also includes an over sampling of 404 likely Democratic primary voters for the 2002 gubernatorial election. The margin for error is ± 5% for the Democratic primary sub-sample. The respondents comprising this over sampling were only asked the questions pertaining to the gubernatorial primary.
Governor
Parris Glendening continues to post impressive job approval numbers as he nears
the midpoint of his second term.
Fifty-seven percent of voters statewide said they approved of
Glendening’s performance as governor, 29% disapproved, and the remaining 14%
gave no answer. This is a slight
improvement over his numbers in our January survey, when 56% said they approved
of the job Glendening was doing as governor, 34% disapproved, and 10% offered
no answer.
Glendening
is riding high with African-Americans (80% approve), Democrats (78%), voters in
Baltimore City (79%) and in the Washington suburbs (69%), and women (63%). The Governor has lost ground among
Republicans, dropping from a 31% approval rating to 21%, but has gained ground
with independents, moving from 40% approval to 49% since January. His approval rating falls below 50% with the
aforementioned Republicans (21%) and independents (49%), and among voters on
the Eastern Shore and in Southern Maryland (46%), in the Baltimore suburbs
(49%), and in Western Maryland (38%).
Lieutenant
Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend is the early favorite in the 2002 race for
Governor, getting 52% of the vote in a hypothetical match-up against the man
everyone agrees would be the GOP’s strongest candidate, 2nd District
Congressman Bob Ehrlich. Ehrlich earns
29% of the vote, with the remaining 19% undecided.
Townsend
leads Ehrlich in every demographic subgroup in the survey except Republicans,
where Ehrlich bests Townsend 65% to 19%.
Townsend posts majorities among African-Americans (77%), Democrats
(61%), and women (61%), but is held to pluralities among whites (44% to 37%),
men (42% to 35%), and independents (47% to 22%).
Townsend’s
name is recognized by 91% of voters surveyed, while 9% did not recognize the
Lieutenant Governor’s name. Fifty-four
percent view her favorably, 15% see her unfavorably, and 22% have a neutral
view of Townsend. Ehrlich’s name, on
the other hand, is recognized by only 54% of survey respondents. Twenty-one percent have a favorable opinion
of Ehrlich, 7% have an unfavorable opinion, and 26% are neutral on
Ehrlich. The remaining 46% did not
recognize his name.
The
route to the Democratic nomination for Governor takes a candidate through the
Democratic primary, and the Lieutenant Governor is well-positioned two years
out. Townsend is viewed favorably by
67% of Democratic primary voters survey, unfavorably by just 7%, and neutrally
by 20%. The remaining 6% did not
recognize her name.
Montgomery
County Executive Doug Duncan’s name is recognized by 49% of Democratic primary votes,
23% favorably 2% unfavorably, and 24% neutrally. The remaining 51% did not recognize Duncan.
Baltimore
County Executive Dutch Ruppersberger is recognized by 51% of Maryland’s
Democratic primary electorate. Nineteen
percent have a favorable opinion of Ruppersberger, 5% have an unfavorable view,
and 27% see him neutrally. The
remaining 49% did not recognize Ruppersberger’s name.
Prince
George’s County Executive is the least well-known of the possible contenders
for the Democratic Party’s gubernatorial nomination. Curry’s name is recognized by 46% of primary voters, 17%
favorably, 1% unfavorably, and 28% neutrally.
The remaining 54% did not recognize Curry’s name.
As
the campaigns are just beginning to ramp up, Kathleen Kennedy Townsend’s favorable
name ID number is 18 points higher than the total name recognition
number of her closest rival, a big head start.
When
the Lieutenant Governor is matched against the three suburban county
executives, Townsend swamps the field with a near-majority 49% of the vote in a
four-way race. Duncan is a distant
second with 12%, Ruppersberger follows with 10%, and Curry trails with 8%. The remaining 21% are undecided.
Townsend
wins a strong majority of African-American (61%) and female (58%) voters, but
must be content with pluralities among whites (43%) and men (40%).
Townsend
leads among Washington area primary voters with 35%, but Duncan (28%) and Curry
(19%) combine to take 47% of the Beltway crowd. Ruppersberger gets 20% of the vote in the Baltimore metropolitan
region, compared to 58% for Townsend, a fellow Baltimore Countian. The simple fact that the Executives are
barely known outside their home counties is illustrated by the vote out of the
rest of the state: Townsend gets 51%,
with Duncan picking up 3%, Ruppersberger garnering 4%, and Curry earning just
1%. However, 41% of voters outside the
metropolitan areas are undecided in the primary contest.
Candidate
Profile Match-up
Fortunes
changes, though, when brief biographical sketches of each of the four
Democratic candidates (including their age, race, sex, office held, and years
in office) are read to voters, minus the candidates’ names. The candidate profiles were assigned letter
designations from A to D in alphabetical order of the candidate’s name. After all four profiles were read to survey
respondents, they were then asked which candidate would get their vote.
Lieutenant
Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend (Candidate D) still leads the field, but
with just 37% of the vote. Closing fast
is Wayne Curry (Candidate A) with 26%, who ran fourth in the traditional
match-up. Doug Duncan (Candidate B) got
13%, and Dutch Ruppersberger (Candidate C) chalked up 12%. The remaining 12% were undecided. Interestingly, 21% were undecided when the
candidate’s names were used.
The
biggest difference between the two match-ups was in the black vote, which
Townsend had won handily. Curry pulls
67% of African-Americans to Townsend’s 22% when candidate profiles are read,
while his share of the white vote (5%) is virtually unchanged.
Duncan’s
and Curry’s share of the Washington area vote goes from a combined 47% to 64%
when candidate profiles reveal job descriptions. Curry makes the biggest gain among Baltimore region voters in the
candidate profile match-up, mostly at Townsend’s expense. Townsend’s share of the primary vote from
the Baltimore region drops from 58% to 41%, while Curry’s rises from 3% to 28%. Ruppersberger’s share of the vote from the
Baltimore region goes from 20% to 25%.
Townsend’s level of support also drops with both men and women, from 40%
to 27%, and from 58% to 46%, respectively.
The potential power of a strong African-American candidate in the Democratic primary cannot be overlooked. A man fitting the description of Wayne Curry completely changes the dynamics of the contest, adding a little spice to the mix, so to speak. Kathleen Kennedy Townsend is clearly the early leader in the 2002 Democratic primary for governor, but much of her support is soft, based on the voters’ recognition of her famous name. Depending on which of these suburban county executives ultimately decides to make this race, it could turn out to be far more interesting than many now image.
Glendening Job Approval
QUESTION: Do you approve or disapprove of the job Parris Glendening is doing as governor?
|
|
Approve |
Disapprove |
No answer |
|
Statewide
|
57% |
29% |
14% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46% |
35% |
19% |
|
|
Baltimore City |
79% |
4% |
17% |
|
Baltimore Suburbs |
49% |
37% |
14% |
|
Washington Suburbs |
69% |
21% |
10% |
|
Western MD |
38% |
45% |
17% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50% |
36% |
14% |
|
|
80% |
6% |
14% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51% |
34% |
15% |
|
|
Women |
63% |
24% |
13% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
78% |
14% |
8% |
|
Republican |
21% |
56% |
23% |
|
Independent |
49% |
30% |
21% |
Name Recognition
I am going to read you the names of several individuals. After I mention each name, I would like you to tell me if you recognize that person. If you do, I would then like you to tell me whether you have a favorable, unfavorable, or neutral opinion of that individual.
|
|
Favorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Don’t Recognize |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54% |
15% |
22% |
9% |
|
|
Bob Ehrlich |
21% |
7% |
26% |
46% |
QUESTION: If the 2002 general election for governor were held today for whom would you vote if the candidates were Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, the Democrat and Bob Ehrlich, the Republican?
|
|
Townsend |
Ehrlich |
Undecided |
|
Statewide
|
52% |
29% |
19% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44% |
37% |
19% |
|
|
77% |
3% |
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43% |
35% |
22% |
|
|
Women |
61% |
23% |
16% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
71% |
11% |
18% |
|
Republican |
19% |
65% |
16% |
|
Independent |
47% |
22% |
31% |
**** 404 Likely 2002 Democratic Primary
Voters ****
Name Recognition
I am going to read you the names of several individuals. After I mention each name, I would like you to tell me if you recognize that person. If you do, I would then like you to tell me whether you have a favorable, unfavorable, or neutral opinion of that individual.
|
|
Favorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Don’t Recognize |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67% |
7% |
20% |
6% |
|
|
Doug Duncan |
23% |
2% |
24% |
51% |
|
Dutch Ruppersberger |
19% |
5% |
27% |
49% |
|
Wayne Curry |
17% |
1% |